• Opinion Corner
  • Open Topics - Teacher Forum
  • Lunar Expedition
  • Mission: Mars
  • Suborbital Sojourn
  • Asteroid Encounter
  • K-3 Space®
  • Orbital Laboratory®
  • Other Space Related Topics
  • NASA Plant Growth Challenge
  • * Please note that messages will not be displayed until they have been approved by the forum's Moderator.

    On August 24, 2006, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) decided Pluto would no longer hold planetary status. The decision by the IAU identifies the basic properties celestial objects will have to have before they can be considered planets.

    The new definition for a planet has been is: "a celestial body that is in orbit around the sun, has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a ... nearly round shape, and has cleared the neighborhood around its orbit." For now, there will be eight planets in our solar system: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. Pluto is automatically disqualified because it has not cleared the neighborhood around its orbit. Pluto is in an area known as the Kuiper belt which contains many other objects the size of Pluto in this same area.

    Instead, Pluto will be reclassified in a new category of "dwarf planets," similar to what long have been termed "minor planets." The definition also lays out a third class of lesser objects that orbit the sun -- "small solar system bodies," a term that will apply to numerous asteroids, comets and other natural satellites.

    The decision at the IAU conference of 2,500 astronomers from 75 countries was a remarkable shift from previous discussions, when the group's leaders suggested a proposal that would have reaffirmed Pluto's planetary status as well as made planets of its largest moon and two other objects. That plan proved highly unpopular and led to days of debate, leading to Pluto's reclassification.

    Now two of the objects that could have come out of this conference as confirmed planets will join Pluto as dwarfs: the asteroid Ceres, which was a planet in the 1800s before its status changed to an asteroid; and 2003 UB313, an icy object slightly larger than Pluto whose discoverer, Michael Brown of the California Institute of Technology, has nicknamed "Xena." Charon, the largest of Pluto's three moons, is no longer under consideration for any special designation.

    This decision is quite controversial, changing the classification of our planets that we have known for the past 76 years. Do you think Pluto should be still considered a planet? Do you agree with the development of smaller classifications of planets? Share your thoughts in the Opinion Corner forum.

    Image of Pluto. Image credit: NASA.
    Pluto, center and it's previously known moon Charon, below Pluto and right of center, shine brightly. Two more moons appear more faintly to the right of the pair. Image credit: NASA.


    Bagnall Elementary School
    Groveland, Massachusetts
    11/28/2007 12:07:51 PM
    Re: The Great Pluto Debate
    pluto should be a planet
    Cynthia Sawatzky

    Custer, Oklahoma
    12/14/2007 8:00:18 AM
    Re: The Great Pluto Debate
    I think it should be a planet. I started learning about the planets just as they took Pluto away. Once a planet, always a planet.

    Coastal Georgia Comprehensive
    Richmond Hill, Georgia
    12/14/2007 1:14:31 PM
    Re: The Great Pluto Debate
    i think that the great pluto should have oxygen so we can live on pluto and then we can have two worlds to live in: planet earth and planet pluto.

    Beulah Middle School
    Beulah, North Dakota
    1/8/2008 11:28:50 AM
    Re: The Great Pluto Debate
    pluto should be condiderd a planet of our solar system

    Anchorage, Alaska
    1/10/2008 7:55:34 AM
    Re: The Great Pluto Debate
    I think that pluto should be a planet still because maybe some ppl might wanna go to pluto and they might wanna say yeah im one of the first ppl on pluto and thats why i think pluto should still be a planet


    Central Middle School
    Anchorage, Alaska
    1/18/2008 8:40:33 AM
    Re: The Great Pluto Debate
    pluto is a planet no matter what

    Eaa Space Week 08
    Oshkosh, Wisconsin
    5/13/2008 8:45:38 AM
    Re: The Great Pluto Debate
    I learned that Pluto is not a one of a kind object in its orbit and that there are other asteroids just like it out there, well they found Pluto first and it is the only one in the exact orbit of the other planets. How do we know that there aren't any other planets or asteroids on OUR orbit on Earth, how can they be sure when we haven't even put people on Mars yet? And what about planet X? So there is just going to be a floating ROCK in the exact orbit between the last planet and planet X? And we have already learned about it so why not just keep it? ONCE A PLANET ALWAYS A PLANET!


    Northern Lights Abc School
    Anchorage, Alaska
    1/14/2009 2:15:29 PM
    Re: The Great Pluto Debate
    i think that pluto should have stayed a planet
    like Kelly schlaak said "once a planet always a planet!"

    Disclaimer: Space Explorers,Inc. cannot be held responsible for comments made by visitors to its message boards. The opinions expressed here reflect the views of the person submitting the reply, Space Explorers does not necessarily subscribe to nor endorse them. Space Explorers staff moderates the message boards and Opinion Corner forum and does not guarantee that all submissions will be posted. Space Explorers reserves the right to omit and/or edit approved submissions for objectionable and/or inappropriate content. Please do not post any personal information unless you want it to be publicly available. For additional information, please view Space Explorers' privacy policy.

    Page 1 2Return to the Forum

    locked You do not have write permissions for this forum. Please [ login ] to unlock your forums.

    Site MapPrivacy Policy